•  
  •  
 

Abstract

International Journal of Exercise Science 16(4): 393-401, 2023. Body composition tools vary in reliability, portability, and accessibility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate test-retest reliability of MuscleSound® (MS) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for both two compartment (region) and three compartment (tissue) models. A secondary aim was to compare body composition values produced by both devices. Fifty participants (n = 25 male, n = 25 female) aged 18-39 years completed two body composition assessments, twice in a single session. Participants arrived at the lab after a 12-hour fast. DXA required participants to lay supine for 10-15 minutes during the scanning process. Thereafter, MS was utilized to measure subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness at seven sites: chest, subscapula, triceps, axilla, suprailium, abdomen, and mid-thigh. MS automatically estimated body composition utilizing a modified Jackson-Pollock equation and the Siri equation within the software. The sequence of assessments was then repeated. Statistical analysis included paired T-tests with Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and least significant change (LSC). Both methods were strongly reliable (ICCMS = .997, ICCDXA-region = .999, ICCDXA-tissue = .999). MS and DXA-region body fat percentages were significantly different (mean difference (%): 2.60 ± 1.32, p < .001) but highly correlated (r = .928, p < .001). Notably, the mean difference was within DXA-region’s calculated least significant change of 3.24%. MS is reliable for assessing body fat percentage in young and middle-aged adults and operators can utilize MS to collect body composition data in the field.

Download

Share

COinS