Dietary Supplement Use and Motivations in Competitive vs. Non-Competitive Athletes

Authors

Amber Hadfield, Southern Utah UniversityFollow
Abigail Larson, Southern Utah UniversityFollow

Abstract

Dietary supplements come in various forms, including powders, bars, gummies, liquids, tablets, and capsules and are commonly used by athletes. Motivations for supplement use are varied and may be influenced by sport type and competitive goals. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare supplement usage and reasons for consumption between competitive (C) and non-competitive (NC) strength and power athletes. METHODS: Strength and power athletes were recruited from a local training center to complete an online survey distributed via QR code and online link. Data collected included competition status, supplements consumed, reasons for use, and knowledge of U.S. supplement regulations. Responses were analyzed using chi-square tests to determine significance between groups (p<0.05). RESULTS: 137 of 165 athletes completed the survey and were included in data analysis. 69 athletes reported being in preparation for a competitive event and 68 reported they did not compete. There were no significant differences between C and NC athletes on the most frequently reported supplements consumed, including protein powders (54.3% vs. 64.9%), creatine (43.5% vs. 54.1%), caffeine (37% vs. 37.8%), multivitamins (19.6% vs. 21.6%), fish oils (17.4% vs. 16.2%), and magnesium (17.4% vs. 16.2%), respectively. The most reported reasons for supplement use were not statistically different between groups and included increase/maintain muscle mass (75.4% vs. 82.4%), increase strength/power (75.4% vs. 82.4%), and health maintenance/prevent nutritional deficiencies (53.6% vs. 57.4%), in C and NC athletes, respectively. However, C athletes were more likely to use supplements for recovery compared to NC athletes (71.0% C and 51.5% NC, p=0.02). 38.5% and 31.3% of C and NC, respectively, were unaware the FDA is not authorized to approve dietary supplements for efficacy before they are marketed. CONCLUSION: Findings in this study indicate similar patterns of supplement consumption and reasons for supplementing between C and NC athletes, however C athletes were more likely to report using supplements to promote recovery. Additionally, over one-third of the sample was unaware that the FDA does not have to approve supplements, indicating this population may need targeted education on supplement claims, efficacy, and safety.

Recommended Citation

Hadfield, Amber and Larson, Abigail (2024) "Dietary Supplement Use and Motivations in Competitive vs. Non-Competitive Athletes," International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings: Vol. 14: Iss. 4, Article 101.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijesab/vol14/iss4/101