•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Consumers are increasingly seeking technology to help track health improvements. This study focuses on a free app that using 3D body scanning to assess anthropometric measures. PURPOSE: to evaluate the validity of a free app for measuring body anthropometrics compared to criterion measures. METHODS: Thirty-two participants (age= 25.9±9.1 years, height= 165.5±10.9 cm, weight= 79.0±20.6 kg) had chest, biceps, forearm, waist, abdomen, hip, thigh, and calf circumferences measured with a flexible measuring tape, and then by the MeThreeSixty app. Dependent (paired) t-tests were used to assess differences between actual and app measures. Bland Altman plots illustrated agreement between measures and percent error was calculated as ((app-actual)/actual)*100. Alpha was set at .05 for all tests. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between actual and app measures for all sites (pp>.05). Agreement was least with hip and calf, and greatest with forearm and abdomen. Absolute error followed the same trend, which was least with hip (6.3%) and calf (6.8%), and greatest with forearm (14.8%) and abdomen (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Since the app can have substantial error and low agreement for some anthropometrics, caution should be used if accurate measures for certain sites are needed.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.