Publication Date

7-1971

Advisor(s) - Committee Chair

James Craig, Sandra Reese, John Dillard

Degree Program

Department of Psychology

Degree Type

Master of Arts

Abstract

This research investigated the reliability and validity of the Psychological Research Survey (PRS). Naive introductory psychology students who had not previously participated in psychological experimentation served as Ss for the reliability assessment. Split-half and test-retest coefficients indicated high reliability. Construct validity was estimated with the use of developmental and situational tests. The PRS was expected to discriminate a more positive attitude toward psychology and psychological research as students progressed from introductory to more advanced courses in psychology. A simple analysis of variance of Ss' PRS scores failed to indicate a significant re-ult. A situation was designed whereby Ss behavior indicated their attitudes. A chi-square comparison of the behavioral measure and PRS scores failed to indicate a significant discrepancy. Criterion validity was estimated by comparing PRS scores with final course grades in an introductory psychology class. No relationship was indicated between the PRS scores and course grades. Although apparently consistent over time and internally, the PRS does not appear to measure the construct, "attitude toward psychology and psychological research."

Disciplines

Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences

Download

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS