Publication Date
7-1983
Advisor(s) - Committee Chair
James Grimm, Kirk Dansereau, John Faine
Degree Program
Department of Sociology
Degree Type
Master of Arts
Abstract
There has been a considerable amount of literature dealing with employees' motives for joining labor unions, but very little attention has been devoted to explaining the reasons for workers deciding to oust their unions through the process of decertification. The few studies which have been conducted in the area of union decertification draw conclusions from the broad nation-wide data supplied in the N.L.R.B. Annual Reports. The remainder of the literature has been published primarily by industrial relations specialists who make speculations about reasons for particular units' choosing to decertify, and offer legal and practical advice to employers on the subject. This thesis provides empirical tests of hypotheses dealing with specific factors which could influence decertification outcomes.
A questionnaire was designed to measure variables which were indices of unit structure and background, unit heterogeneity, economic conditions, preliminary union and company campaign activity, and the actions taken by the union and company during the decertification campaign process. This questionnaire was mailed to the personnel directors of 350 U.S. firms which had experienced union decertification elections during Fiscal Year 1979. A bivariate analysis was used in testing the significance of 35 factors in contributing to election outcome from the responses provided by the 130 returned questionnaires.
Disciplines
Business | Human Resources Management | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Sociology
Recommended Citation
Lacy, Stephen, "An Empirical Examination of Union Decertifications in the United States" (1983). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 3298.
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3298
Comments
Access granted to WKU students, faculty and staff only.
After an extensive unsuccessful search for the author, this thesis is considered an orphan work, which may be protected by copyright. The inclusion of this orphan work on TopScholar does not guarantee that that orphan work may be used for any purpose and any use of the orphan work may subject the user to a claim of copyright infringement. The reproduction of this work is made by WKU without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and is made for purposes of preservation and research.
See also WKU Archives - Authorization for Use of Thesis, Special Project & Dissertation