Publication Date
8-1981
Advisor(s) - Committee Chair
Harry Robe, Betsy Howton, Lynn Clark
Degree Program
Department of Psychology
Degree Type
Master of Arts
Abstract
Pre- and posttest scores for five sets of variables were compared to determine the differences between a training method which includes the theory and basic concepts underlying the Reality Therapy behavior management strategy and training in the behavior management strategy alone. The five sets of variables include teachers' perceptions of student classroom behavior as assessed by the Walker Problem Behavior Identification Checklist; teachers' perceptions of student social conformity, competency, and sociability as assessed by the three scales of the Teacher Questionnaire; and students' perceptions of classroom environment as assessed by the Student Questionnaire. The subjects were four second and fourth grade teachers and their respective classes from four public-rural elementary schools in Central Kentucky. Classes were assigned to a Full Treatment or Partial Treatment group on the basis of grade, one second and one fourth grade in each group. The teachers of both groups participated in training programs prior to the implementation of the eight week study. Although the results of the study indicated movement in the predicted direction for four of the five sets of variables (behavior, competency, sociability, and students' perception of classroom environment), the overall findings failed to reveal statistically significant differences between the two methods of training teachers in the Reality Therapy behavior management strategy. A general program effect, however, was noted on students’ perceptions of classroom environment.
Disciplines
Applied Behavior Analysis | Comparative Psychology | Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Recommended Citation
Lambert, Jacquelyn, "A Study of the Differences Between Two Methods of Training the Reality Therapy Behavior Management Strategy" (1981). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 3309.
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3309
Comments
Access granted to WKU students, faculty and staff only.
After an extensive unsuccessful search for the author, this thesis is considered an orphan work, which may be protected by copyright. The inclusion of this orphan work on TopScholar does not guarantee that that orphan work may be used for any purpose and any use of the orphan work may subject the user to a claim of copyright infringement. The reproduction of this work is made by WKU without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and is made for purposes of preservation and research.
See also WKU Archives - Authorization for Use of Thesis, Special Project & Dissertation