Publication Date
8-2005
Advisor(s) - Committee Chair
Thomas Nicholson, John White, Richard Wilson
Degree Program
Department of Public Health
Degree Type
Master of Science
Abstract
Drug laws and policies have certainly had an impact on countries, whether it is positive or negative seems to be a debatable and inflammable issue. This study endeavored to analyze the drug laws and policies of three comparable countries – the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada – to assess if a difference exists in recreational marijuana use patterns among marijuana users from these countries. It was evident that the United States followed a prohibitional model and the United Kingdom and Canada favored varying degrees of decriminalization. In addition, demographic and lifestyle characteristics, legal history, and general well-being of the three samples were compared. An epidemiological cross-sectional descriptive study was undertaken to study adult recreational marijuana users from the three countries via the internet, from 1996 to 1997. The results of the study revealed no significant difference in marijuana use, demographics, and general well-being among the three samples, thereby, implying that the highly punitive laws of the United States sample had more legal problems consequent to drug use behavior. The stringent drug policies of the United States may explain the above finding. Several implications for drug policy reform in the United States emerged from this study.
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences | Pharmacy Administration, Policy and Regulation | Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences | Public Health
Recommended Citation
Jayakumar, Monisha, "Comparison of Drug Policies & Recreational Marijuana Use in the United States, the United Kingdom & Canada: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study" (2005). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 3399.
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3399
Comments
Access granted to WKU students, faculty and staff only.
After an extensive unsuccessful search for the author, this thesis is considered an orphan work, which may be protected by copyright. The inclusion of this orphan work on TopScholar does not guarantee that that orphan work may be used for any purpose and any use of the orphan work may subject the user to a claim of copyright infringement. The reproduction of this work is made by WKU without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and is made for purposes of preservation and research.
See also WKU Archives - Authorization for Use of Thesis, Special Project & Dissertation