Publication Date
5-2007
Advisor(s) - Committee Chair
Carl Meyers, Melissa Hakman, Lakeisha Meyer
Degree Program
Department of Psychology
Degree Type
Specialist in Education
Abstract
Reading fluency is currently a popular focus in public school systems. However, little research has been conducted on various methods of assessing reading fluency. The current study compared scores from two reading fluency measures, the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) and the Reading Fluency test of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement – Third Edition (WJ-III), to reading tests on a nationally normed test of reading achievement, the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). The comparison was conducted on a sample of 86 students across three grade-levels (i.e., first, third and fifth) of elementary-aged students to look for differences across ages. After performing Pearson correlations, results indicated that both the DIBELS and the WJ-III correlated significantly with the ITBS scores at all three grade levels. The findings in this study help provide support for the use of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency test and the WJ-III Reading Fluency test as valid measures of reading fluency. Furthermore, the results indicate that it is possible to use reading fluency tests such as the DIBELS and the WJ-III to predict the performance on group-administered, nationally normed tests of reading achievement.
Disciplines
Child Psychology | Education | Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research | Elementary Education | Language and Literacy Education | Psychology | School Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Recommended Citation
Martin, Lauren, "Comparing Brief Reading Fluency Measures with the Reading Tests of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills" (2007). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 3438.
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3438
Comments
Access granted to WKU students, faculty and staff only.
After an extensive unsuccessful search for the author, this thesis is considered an orphan work, which may be protected by copyright. The inclusion of this orphan work on TopScholar does not guarantee that that orphan work may be used for any purpose and any use of the orphan work may subject the user to a claim of copyright infringement. The reproduction of this work is made by WKU without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage and is made for purposes of preservation and research.
See also WKU Archives - Authorization for Use of Thesis, Special Project & Dissertation